Archive for May, 2007

A "meaningful specific"

Posted by Peter on May 30, 2007
Uncategorized / 1 Comment

Heard this little nugget from Zig Ziglar, “you must become a meaningful specific rather than a wandering generality.” Sort of applicable to many small firm lawyers no (including the author at times)?

Post to Twitter

It’s not a sale unless you get paid…

Posted by Peter on May 29, 2007
Uncategorized / No Comments

Good piece about client billing and collections here from the Trib. Some good reminder nuggets:

–”Soft touch” collections…not going to outside collection agencies too quickly;

–Rookie mistake of not having a collection policy;

–Get money up front;

–Evaluate specific relationships…maybe a client is worth a short delay in payment; many companies have periodic cash-flow problems;

–And, it’s not a sale/client unless you get paid!!

Post to Twitter

What do you do?

Posted by Peter on May 26, 2007
Uncategorized / No Comments

Rjon over at How to make it rain posts an interesting e-mail exchange discussing how lawyers should answer the question, so, what do you do?

Post to Twitter

Who’s blog is this…

Posted by Peter on May 26, 2007
Uncategorized / No Comments

Practical Lawyering?

Post to Twitter

Lawyer etiquette…

Posted by Peter on May 26, 2007
Uncategorized / No Comments

I’ve had a rash of opposing lawyers lately who have just been horrible in their treatment…primarily causing me to waste time sitting in courtrooms waiting for them. Very annoying. What good purpose does this serve? I’m just trying to figure out these lawyers’ motives…don’t they know that other lawyers are always your best referral source? Don’t they want to have a good relationship with the attorney on the case to get their client a better and more efficient result?

Apparently not. I think it’s typically associates in larger Chicago law firms who essentially don’t have an incentive to produce business nor do they have a motive for an efficient client result. Plus I think so many Chicago lawyers just think we’re in this big city with all these lawyers and they’re not going to see me again. Very short-sighted I think.

Post to Twitter

Paperless cont…

Posted by Peter on May 26, 2007
Uncategorized / No Comments

Thanks for the great comments on paperless offices. I’ll tell ya what’s keeping us from being 100% paperless…it’s because our two administrative staff persons are both offsite. I don’t have anyone onsite to scan stuff that comes in via snail mail. So if things come in via e-mail or fax, then they stay digital, but if they come in as paper then it’s up to me to scan them in and it’s not always feasible for me to spend my time in that fasion.

Post to Twitter

Chicago lawyer jailed

Posted by Peter on May 26, 2007
Uncategorized / 2 Comments

Saw this piece about a young lawyer sentenced to 14 days in jail for contempt of court. Anyone know more about it? I see the Judge is Pamela Hill Veal in Cook Municipal One. So it’s the Daley Center arbitration call or collections or forcible entry and detainer maybe? Well, she got out after a day so at least her/lawyer’s Memorial Day weekend wasn’t impacted.

Post to Twitter

Power of Attorney litigation

Posted by Peter on May 18, 2007
Uncategorized / No Comments

Thought I’d pass on an interesting comment from Cook probate Judge James G. Riley from a recent CBA seminar. He said POA litigation has quadrupled in the last two to three years. Maybe a growth area to get into? This is likely the tip of the iceberg with our aging population, right?

Mostly removal of POA agent issues.

Post to Twitter

Is she a lawyer?

Posted by Peter on May 18, 2007
Uncategorized / No Comments

Check them out…http://www.ishereallyalawyer.com/.

Post to Twitter

Attorneys directing clients to go behind opposing counsel’s back

Posted by Peter on May 14, 2007
Uncategorized / No Comments

I just wanted to share a question and some responses that I saw on the ISBA list serve. This one is fairly common and I’ve read ARDC troubles for lawyers on this issue. A fairly well-known lawyer in the northwest ‘burbs go nailed on this recently.

Query:

I found a letter and draft judgment slipped under the door to my office – marked hand delivered on Friday. However, the letter indicated that counsel had sent a copy of the proposed draft to his client with instructions to show it to my client. While counsel did not directly communicate with my client, I wonder what other feel about this practice.

Response:

The consensus was exactly what I thought: Violation of RPC 4.2. While our clients may share information, documents, correspondence, etc. with their prospective ex spouses, attorneys should never direct their clients to do that behind the other attorney’s back, and worse yet, tell counsel s/he did just that.

Post to Twitter

Subscribe in a reader

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to Solo In Chicago by Email

Emails for Small Business with Constant Contact

Business Cards and Postcards Printing and read Uprinting.com Customer Review


A Brochure Printing Company

Follow soloinchicago on Twitter

Search

Archives

 

May 2007
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
Free Proof Before You Pay