<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Be Too Judge Reliant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soloinchicago.com/495/dont-be-too-judge-reliant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soloinchicago.com/495/dont-be-too-judge-reliant/</link>
	<description>Down-To-Earth Advice for Legal Entrepreneurs in Chicagoland and Around the World!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:13:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deuce Geary</title>
		<link>http://soloinchicago.com/495/dont-be-too-judge-reliant/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Deuce Geary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soloinchicago.com/?p=495#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Oops..  Hit &quot;publish by accident.  Anyway . . . &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I know a lawyer who, in opposition to an attorney fee motion, heavily criticized the trial judge for not knowing his way around the law and claimed fees should be limited because the judgment would obviously be reversed on appeal.  The reason he felt he could do this is that the judge had announced his retirement and would be off the bench by the time the motion was heard.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Guess who decided to delay ihis retirement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops..  Hit &#8220;publish by accident.  Anyway . . . </p>
<p>I know a lawyer who, in opposition to an attorney fee motion, heavily criticized the trial judge for not knowing his way around the law and claimed fees should be limited because the judgment would obviously be reversed on appeal.  The reason he felt he could do this is that the judge had announced his retirement and would be off the bench by the time the motion was heard.</p>
<p>Guess who decided to delay ihis retirement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deuce Geary</title>
		<link>http://soloinchicago.com/495/dont-be-too-judge-reliant/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Deuce Geary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soloinchicago.com/?p=495#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I know a lawyer who, in opposition to an attorney fee motion, heavily criticized the trial judge and claimed fees should be limited because the judgment would obviously be reversed on appeal..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know a lawyer who, in opposition to an attorney fee motion, heavily criticized the trial judge and claimed fees should be limited because the judgment would obviously be reversed on appeal..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
