<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solo and small firm trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://soloinchicago.com/171/solo-and-small-firm-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://soloinchicago.com/171/solo-and-small-firm-trends/</link>
	<description>Down-To-Earth Advice for Legal Entrepreneurs in Chicagoland and Around the World!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:47:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://soloinchicago.com/171/solo-and-small-firm-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soloinchicago.com/?p=171#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Susan.  I saw this piece here from the JD Journal (www.jdjournal.com/articles/the-country-esquires.php) about small town lawyering.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My off-the-cuff thoughts are it&#039;s certainly doable to be a generalist and outside of urban America I&#039;m sure it&#039;s still common.  From the urban lawyer&#039;s perspective however, I question its efficiency.  If I can practice in my 2-3 specialties is it worth the risk and more so the huge inefficiences (of having to learn totally new areas of law) to be a generalist? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m more curious about using of-counsel relationships and &quot;networked&quot; solos to accomplish the same goal more effectively I would argue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Susan.  I saw this piece here from the JD Journal (www.jdjournal.com/articles/the-country-esquires.php) about small town lawyering.  </p>
<p>My off-the-cuff thoughts are it&#8217;s certainly doable to be a generalist and outside of urban America I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s still common.  From the urban lawyer&#8217;s perspective however, I question its efficiency.  If I can practice in my 2-3 specialties is it worth the risk and more so the huge inefficiences (of having to learn totally new areas of law) to be a generalist? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m more curious about using of-counsel relationships and &#8220;networked&#8221; solos to accomplish the same goal more effectively I would argue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://soloinchicago.com/171/solo-and-small-firm-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soloinchicago.com/?p=171#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Please read my column from the Connecticut Law Tribune &quot;Certification Won&#039;t Cure Profession&#039;s Ills&quot; which highlights that most people I&#039;ve talked to want the generalist.  They miss the days of going to one lawyer for their needs.  I&#039;ve found your post and the referenced article validating.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Susan Cartier Liebel&lt;br/&gt;www.susancartierliebel.typepad.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please read my column from the Connecticut Law Tribune &#8220;Certification Won&#8217;t Cure Profession&#8217;s Ills&#8221; which highlights that most people I&#8217;ve talked to want the generalist.  They miss the days of going to one lawyer for their needs.  I&#8217;ve found your post and the referenced article validating.</p>
<p>Susan Cartier Liebel<br /><a href="http://www.susancartierliebel.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.susancartierliebel.typepad.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

